XB-FEAT-22066202: Difference between revisions
imported>Xenbase |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=nomenclature changes= | =nomenclature changes= | ||
April 2021 | |||
this gene page | this gene page has been repeatedly flagged for update in the monthly Entrez gene report, so I looked into the reason why a bit further. ( in jan2023, we removed the 'like' from the name, and I edited the below passges, removing the 'l' from symbols and like from names to reduce confusion) | ||
There are supposedly 3 ''ndnf'' genes in ''Xenopus'' according to v9 genomes: | |||
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 1, gene 1 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066195) symbol:''ndnf1.1'' on chromosome 3 (formerlay called ndnfl1.1) | |||
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 1, gene 2 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066202) symbol:''ndnf1.2''on chromosome 3 (formerlay called ndnfl1.2) | |||
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 2 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066209) symbol:''ndnf2''on chromosome 7 (formerly called ndnfl2) | |||
There are several points to consider to get these genes named correctly | |||
1) the duplication of ndnf1, | |||
2) whether or not they are orthologs of the human NDNF gene and | |||
3) if all the gene models for ''Xenopus'' are on the correct/appropriate gene pages on Xenbase | |||
1) In the Xtrop genome annotation version 9.1, ''ndnf1.1 and ndnf1.2'' were thought to be a tandem duplications, and thus were assigned ''.1'' and ''.2'' suffixes. However the below synteny analysis based on Xtrop genome v10.0 shows that this is likely incorrect, as here is no second '.2' model. | |||
human: Chr4: PRDM5< SETP12< '''NDNF<''' NDNF-AS1> '''TNIP3<''' | |||
Xtr chr3 (v10.0) ''synpo> myoz3> dctn4< smim3< '''ndnf1.1<''' gpx3> '''tnip1<''' anxa6< slc7a2.2< zp4< LOC105946789[lincRNA]> sqstm1< tbc1d9b<'' | |||
Xla.L chr3 (v9.2) ''synpo.L> myoz3.L> dctn4.L< PROVsmim3.L< '''ndnf1.1.L<''' gpx3.L> '''tnip1.L<''' anxa6.L< slc7a2.2.L< zp4.L< LOC105946789[a lncRNA]> sqstm1< tbc1d9b<'' | |||
2) the ''ndnf1'' genes are likely TRUE orthologs of human NDNF as in ''Xenopus'', ''ndnf1'' '''has''' a conserved [albeit loose] synteny pattern being adjacent to ''tnip1''. | |||
3) human does not have a named, 2nd, NDNF gene (ie no human NDNF2) | |||
Looking at the genes adjacent to ''ndnf2'' in ''Xenopus'', but in human, I can't find any conserved patterns/elements. | |||
Human: chr10 RGR> RPL12P29> '''CCSER2'''> | |||
Human Chr4: TRMT10A< '''MTTP'''> C4ORF54< DAPP1> etc | |||
Conclusions: | |||
the ''Xenopus'' ndnf2 gene shoudl be called a like gene, not '2' suffixes- as RefSEq wouldn't accpect a 2nd new gene named just in ''Xenopus'', ie they won't set a precedent of naming this gene with a anew serial number. As the gene is very much like the ''ndnf'' gene yet are non-syntenic, we propose calling it ''ndnfl''. | |||
Xla Chr7.L: ''pcbd1.L> sgpl1.L< XB5893022.L> tbata.L> LOC108695783 [prov:mttp]> LOC108695784 [prov:star] '''ndnfl.L<''' ccser2.L>'' | |||
Xtr Chr7: ''pcbd1> sgpl1< .LOC733728> tbata> mttp.2> LOC116412463> '''LOC100488368[nfndl]<''' ccser2>'' | |||
Actions needed: | |||
1)Xenbase curator propose that ''ndnf1.1'' is the true ortholog of human NDNF and should be called ''ndnf'' [done- updated 31JAN2023 to ''ndnf''] | |||
2) the gene page for ndnfl1.2 could be taken down, or ammended.[ done- 2FEB2023 put not in current assembly on XB-GENEPAGE-22066202] | |||
3) ''ndnf2.L'' should change to the symbol ''ndnfl'', and Xtr LOC100488368/Entrez Gene: 100488368 (XBXT10g012299) can be added to the ''ndnfl'' gene page as the v10 gene model. | |||
4) as an aside annotation .... Xla LOC108695783 should be assigned to ''mttp'' gene page based on synteny. |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 28 July 2023
ndnfl1.2
This is the community wiki page for the gene ndnfl1.2 please feel free to add any information that is relevant to this gene that is not already captured elsewhere in Xenbase.
nomenclature changes
April 2021
this gene page has been repeatedly flagged for update in the monthly Entrez gene report, so I looked into the reason why a bit further. ( in jan2023, we removed the 'like' from the name, and I edited the below passges, removing the 'l' from symbols and like from names to reduce confusion)
There are supposedly 3 ndnf genes in Xenopus according to v9 genomes:
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 1, gene 1 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066195) symbol:ndnf1.1 on chromosome 3 (formerlay called ndnfl1.1)
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 1, gene 2 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066202) symbol:ndnf1.2on chromosome 3 (formerlay called ndnfl1.2)
- neuron-derived neurotrophic factor 2 (XB-GENEPAGE-22066209) symbol:ndnf2on chromosome 7 (formerly called ndnfl2)
There are several points to consider to get these genes named correctly 1) the duplication of ndnf1,
2) whether or not they are orthologs of the human NDNF gene and
3) if all the gene models for Xenopus are on the correct/appropriate gene pages on Xenbase
1) In the Xtrop genome annotation version 9.1, ndnf1.1 and ndnf1.2 were thought to be a tandem duplications, and thus were assigned .1 and .2 suffixes. However the below synteny analysis based on Xtrop genome v10.0 shows that this is likely incorrect, as here is no second '.2' model.
human: Chr4: PRDM5< SETP12< NDNF< NDNF-AS1> TNIP3<
Xtr chr3 (v10.0) synpo> myoz3> dctn4< smim3< ndnf1.1< gpx3> tnip1< anxa6< slc7a2.2< zp4< LOC105946789[lincRNA]> sqstm1< tbc1d9b<
Xla.L chr3 (v9.2) synpo.L> myoz3.L> dctn4.L< PROVsmim3.L< ndnf1.1.L< gpx3.L> tnip1.L< anxa6.L< slc7a2.2.L< zp4.L< LOC105946789[a lncRNA]> sqstm1< tbc1d9b<
2) the ndnf1 genes are likely TRUE orthologs of human NDNF as in Xenopus, ndnf1 has a conserved [albeit loose] synteny pattern being adjacent to tnip1.
3) human does not have a named, 2nd, NDNF gene (ie no human NDNF2)
Looking at the genes adjacent to ndnf2 in Xenopus, but in human, I can't find any conserved patterns/elements.
Human: chr10 RGR> RPL12P29> CCSER2>
Human Chr4: TRMT10A< MTTP> C4ORF54< DAPP1> etc
Conclusions:
the Xenopus ndnf2 gene shoudl be called a like gene, not '2' suffixes- as RefSEq wouldn't accpect a 2nd new gene named just in Xenopus, ie they won't set a precedent of naming this gene with a anew serial number. As the gene is very much like the ndnf gene yet are non-syntenic, we propose calling it ndnfl.
Xla Chr7.L: pcbd1.L> sgpl1.L< XB5893022.L> tbata.L> LOC108695783 [prov:mttp]> LOC108695784 [prov:star] ndnfl.L< ccser2.L>
Xtr Chr7: pcbd1> sgpl1< .LOC733728> tbata> mttp.2> LOC116412463> LOC100488368[nfndl]< ccser2>
Actions needed:
1)Xenbase curator propose that ndnf1.1 is the true ortholog of human NDNF and should be called ndnf [done- updated 31JAN2023 to ndnf]
2) the gene page for ndnfl1.2 could be taken down, or ammended.[ done- 2FEB2023 put not in current assembly on XB-GENEPAGE-22066202]
3) ndnf2.L should change to the symbol ndnfl, and Xtr LOC100488368/Entrez Gene: 100488368 (XBXT10g012299) can be added to the ndnfl gene page as the v10 gene model.
4) as an aside annotation .... Xla LOC108695783 should be assigned to mttp gene page based on synteny.